The History of Concrete review: John Wilson’s documentary is probably unlike anything you’ve ever seen

John Wilson, creator of acclaimed documentaries like “How to with John Wilson,” has once again pushed the boundaries of documentary filmmaking with “The History of Concrete.” While the title suggests a straightforward exploration of concrete, the film is more complex. Wilson’s true passion lies not in concrete itself but in the people and stories surrounding it.

From its opening scenes, where Wilson searches for a new project while trying to learn about concrete, it becomes clear that this documentary is as much about the maker as the made. The meandering narrative invites viewers to join Wilson on his journey of discovery. As he explores various topics related to concrete, including its history and future applications, the film’s tone shifts between humor, curiosity, and introspection.

One striking aspect of “The History of Concrete” is its use of tangents and detours. Wilson visits a wax museum, interviews a star from “The Sopranos,” and learns about gum removal from New York City’s sidewalks. While these segments are engaging in their own right, they leave viewers wondering what to take away from the documentary.

As the film progresses, it eventually focuses more on concrete itself. This is where some of the most interesting and thought-provoking moments emerge, particularly in Wilson’s exploration of the future of concrete and its implications. His interactions with Jack Macco are also compelling, but at times cringe-worthy, raising questions about whether viewers are watching a genuine exploration or simply another example of Wilson’s humor.

“The History of Concrete” feels more like a character study of its creator than a documentary about concrete. While it’s undeniable that Wilson has created something unique and engaging, one can’t help but feel that he’s sacrificed some of his own standards along the way. As entertainment, however, “The History of Concrete” is worth watching.

The film also raises important questions about the role of documentaries in society. Are they meant to inform or entertain? Can we have it both ways, and if so, at what cost? Wilson himself notes that finding a new project can be challenging, but perhaps he’s more interested in creating something for himself than his audience.

As Wilson continues to push the boundaries of documentary filmmaking, it’s hard not to wonder what he’ll come up with next. Will it be another exploration of human connection or perhaps something more concrete? One thing is certain: John Wilson is never one to shy away from a challenge, and his audience will undoubtedly follow him on this journey.